| 20 years is a long time to be in the
wilderness. But this is exactly how long doctors and dentists who have been
diagnosed as HIV+ have had to wait and campaign to be allowed to practise
their professions again.
In recent times there has been a growing body of evidence
to show that the anti-retroviral medications can control HIV so effectively
that patients with HIV display levels of the infective particle in their
blood that are too low even to measure.
Combine this knowledge with the tight infection control
levels in place especially in dental practice and it is extremely difficult
to say any restrictions on HIV+ healthcare professionals being allowed to
practise is anything other than discriminatory.
According to a report in yesterday’s Independent
newspaper, the Department of Health is reportedly ready to launch a
consultation before the end of the year to canvas opinion from healthcare
professionals and patients, pending a decision in 2012.
Of course, this is an emotive subject and the DH is
thought to be understandably concerned about public opinion. The fear and
ignorance that pervades around the subject of HIV is such that any wrong
step by the Department could give rise to a public backlash that could
scupper any move to lift the working restrictions.
However I agree with the oft-mentioned sentiment that HIV
is not a notifiable disease and according to the Health Protection Agency
patients are not required to tell you if they are HIV+; however, you are
expected to treat all patients the same. Why can’t clinicians be afforded
the same courtesy? |